- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. This was no doubt going to end in deletion anyway, as there is no evidence whatever of notability, but we don't need to wait for a week, as the contents were almost entirely copied from other sources, such as http://link.springer.com/journal/41309 & http://www.springer.com/political+science/journal/41309 so it qualifies for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement. (In my opinion it also came close to qualifying for speedy deletion as promotional.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Interest Groups & Advocacy
- Interest Groups & Advocacy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to meet the general notability guideline. Google doesn't bring up (from what I see) any references beyond the basic sales listing given in the article. It's likely not promotional enough to speedy delete on those grounds but the intent here seems to give this relatively new journal some attention. 331dot ( talk) 13:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. This was no doubt going to end in deletion anyway, as there is no evidence whatever of notability, but we don't need to wait for a week, as the contents were almost entirely copied from other sources, such as http://link.springer.com/journal/41309 & http://www.springer.com/political+science/journal/41309 so it qualifies for speedy deletion as a copyright infringement. (In my opinion it also came close to qualifying for speedy deletion as promotional.) The editor who uses the pseudonym " JamesBWatson" ( talk) 14:01, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
Interest Groups & Advocacy
- Interest Groups & Advocacy ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not seem to meet the general notability guideline. Google doesn't bring up (from what I see) any references beyond the basic sales listing given in the article. It's likely not promotional enough to speedy delete on those grounds but the intent here seems to give this relatively new journal some attention. 331dot ( talk) 13:14, 14 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.