This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 January 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Although the topic is moderately notable, I see nothing of encyclopedic quality here, and no reputable sources, in spite of the fact that the article dates back to 2005 Looie496 ( talk) 19:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 January 17. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was no consensus. MBisanz talk 02:08, 26 January 2009 (UTC) reply
Although the topic is moderately notable, I see nothing of encyclopedic quality here, and no reputable sources, in spite of the fact that the article dates back to 2005 Looie496 ( talk) 19:01, 2 January 2009 (UTC) reply