The result was Delete, website does not have the significant coverage in reliable sources to meet the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 12:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I propose that this article be deleted, as it appears to be about a non-notable wrestling website. There are no reliable sources listed and any claims of notability appear to relate to associated people, not the website itself. If some sources could be listed, it would be a good start towards making this a good article. Tnxman307 ( talk) 20:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Although it is a notable website, I don't think it should have it's own article. RC-0722 247.5/ 1 13:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Oduwildman ( talk) 17:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep. The web site does NOT rely on the Association. In fact, the media web site gets 10-15 times the traffic the association site does. You're telling me that a 13-year media web site (Which was independent prior to 2004) and has its news running on ESPN and the USA Today isn't worthy of a listing. I'm sorry I don't quite "grasp" your wikipedia relevance, but this site is relevant to thousands and thousands of people. I'm trying to keep building the listing to please you wiki people who obviously know ZERO about wrestling. Instead of being a pain in the butt, how about some tips on what else you people would want to see.
Google InterMat
Oduwildman (
talk) 16:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
reply
Alright guys, have your fun. If that's how it's set up, that's how it's set up. Oduwildman ( talk) 21:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC) reply
The result was Delete, website does not have the significant coverage in reliable sources to meet the relevant notability guideline. Davewild ( talk) 12:32, 4 May 2008 (UTC) reply
I propose that this article be deleted, as it appears to be about a non-notable wrestling website. There are no reliable sources listed and any claims of notability appear to relate to associated people, not the website itself. If some sources could be listed, it would be a good start towards making this a good article. Tnxman307 ( talk) 20:17, 25 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Delete Although it is a notable website, I don't think it should have it's own article. RC-0722 247.5/ 1 13:25, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Oduwildman ( talk) 17:48, 28 April 2008 (UTC) reply
Keep. The web site does NOT rely on the Association. In fact, the media web site gets 10-15 times the traffic the association site does. You're telling me that a 13-year media web site (Which was independent prior to 2004) and has its news running on ESPN and the USA Today isn't worthy of a listing. I'm sorry I don't quite "grasp" your wikipedia relevance, but this site is relevant to thousands and thousands of people. I'm trying to keep building the listing to please you wiki people who obviously know ZERO about wrestling. Instead of being a pain in the butt, how about some tips on what else you people would want to see.
Google InterMat
Oduwildman (
talk) 16:48, 29 April 2008 (UTC)
reply
Alright guys, have your fun. If that's how it's set up, that's how it's set up. Oduwildman ( talk) 21:11, 29 April 2008 (UTC) reply