- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Intensified submarine warfare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term used in a few history books. No clear agreed upon meaning (googling finds authors using it in the plain english sense to refer to the 1915 campaign and the proposed 1917 campaign, not the period the article talks about), and not apparently used except by those authors. Also the article is currently factually problematic, as many writers consider prize rules to be essentially in place in this period and certainly do not agree that submarines were "virtually ineffective". Fangz ( talk) 17:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- In fact might be only used in a single history book, the second source listed on the page finds no reference to the term in google books. Fangz ( talk) 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fangz ( talk) 18:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- delete, can't find any good sources using this name, just few passing mentions. Artem.G ( talk) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete If you can enumerate only a couple of books that use the term in isolation, it is not a suitable article topic. Compare to Unrestricted submarine warfare as an actual, solidly documented concept. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 06:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 23:09, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Intensified submarine warfare ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable term used in a few history books. No clear agreed upon meaning (googling finds authors using it in the plain english sense to refer to the 1915 campaign and the proposed 1917 campaign, not the period the article talks about), and not apparently used except by those authors. Also the article is currently factually problematic, as many writers consider prize rules to be essentially in place in this period and certainly do not agree that submarines were "virtually ineffective". Fangz ( talk) 17:40, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- In fact might be only used in a single history book, the second source listed on the page finds no reference to the term in google books. Fangz ( talk) 17:56, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Fangz ( talk) 18:00, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military and Germany. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 19:30, 12 April 2024 (UTC)
- delete, can't find any good sources using this name, just few passing mentions. Artem.G ( talk) 19:15, 14 April 2024 (UTC)
- Delete If you can enumerate only a couple of books that use the term in isolation, it is not a suitable article topic. Compare to Unrestricted submarine warfare as an actual, solidly documented concept. -- Elmidae ( talk · contribs) 06:06, 19 April 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.