The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rationale: Does not meet wp:notability, content is mostly self created WP:NOTSOAPBOX, clearly promotional material with puffery. also inherent importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published!
Shrikanthv (
talk) 12:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdraw by nominator , as new notablitity information found and puffery can be reworked
Shrikanthv (
talk) 09:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment In defense of this article, Satchidananda-Ashram didn't self-publish the magazines, books, or articles used in creating this text. The New York times, documentaries, interviews, and other first-hand sources are used. This is a Yoga style that reaches global populations, and needs to be differentiated from Arubindo's teaching.
Joellepearson (
talk) 10:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Sam SailorTalk! 17:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment As far as I can see, it's a huge organisation, which is mentioned in other publications. So, it seems notable. Best regards,
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk! 05:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment What other information do you need in order for this to be removed from the "considered for deletion" queue? Thanks!
Joellepearson (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 19:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Rationale: Does not meet wp:notability, content is mostly self created WP:NOTSOAPBOX, clearly promotional material with puffery. also inherent importance cannot be claimed WP:INHERITORG , WP:reference are mostly selfsourced, also note the books & magazince sourced are also self published!
Shrikanthv (
talk) 12:46, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Withdraw by nominator , as new notablitity information found and puffery can be reworked
Shrikanthv (
talk) 09:00, 26 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment In defense of this article, Satchidananda-Ashram didn't self-publish the magazines, books, or articles used in creating this text. The New York times, documentaries, interviews, and other first-hand sources are used. This is a Yoga style that reaches global populations, and needs to be differentiated from Arubindo's teaching.
Joellepearson (
talk) 10:25, 15 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, --
Sam SailorTalk! 17:02, 22 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment As far as I can see, it's a huge organisation, which is mentioned in other publications. So, it seems notable. Best regards,
Joshua Jonathan -
Let's talk! 05:12, 24 October 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment What other information do you need in order for this to be removed from the "considered for deletion" queue? Thanks!
Joellepearson (
talk) —Preceding
undated comment added 19:56, 27 October 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.