This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources provided are tangential. Spartaz Humbug! 06:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable fringe organisation. No reliable sources. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:RS andy ( talk) 08:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Thank you for being specific. Let me give you a brief explanation of the references.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Content586 ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) reply
http://www.macquarieinstitute.com.au/pdfs/Are_You_Stressed_Out_Yet.pdf and http://www.emich.edu/cerns/downloads/papers/PoliceStaff/Shift%20Work,%20%20Stress,%20%20Wellness/The%20Maintenance%20of%20Police%20Officer%20Health%20through%20a%20Mandatory%20Wellness%20Program.pdf K2709 ( talk) 20:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC) reply
A few more references from a quick google-scholar search:
One was from NBC World News, which was mainly focused on the Institute of Heartmath and their research, the other was ABC Today Show with Mat Lauer, that was on was about the heart and emotions and talked about the research of the Institute of Heartmath and did a short interview with their Rollin McCraty( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT5kHw3D7Fk&feature=related). I was also as able to confirm what the Institute representative told me about a new peer reviewed article about Heartmath interventions being used with children diagnosed with ADHD. While the July-August issue of Alternative Therapies was not yet available, they have a link on their site to the peer reviewed Randomized Controlled Trial article title- Coherence Training in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Cognitive Functions and Behavioral Changes: http://www.alternative-therapies.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/Content.Main/id/73/scribd . In light of of this, does anyone feel the organization is non-notable?
I still think the the part of the entry about Technology and emwave/consumer electronics is too much like an advertisement, and that wiki readers would be more interested in knowing about the scope of their peer reviewed research. Perhaps listing the various studies along with verifiable citations would be a much better use of article. Williammichaels ( talk
This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2010 July 25. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. Consensus is that the sources provided are tangential. Spartaz Humbug! 06:25, 9 July 2010 (UTC) reply
Contested prod. Non-notable fringe organisation. No reliable sources. Fails WP:SPAM, WP:RS andy ( talk) 08:48, 24 June 2010 (UTC) reply
Thank you for being specific. Let me give you a brief explanation of the references.
—Preceding unsigned comment added by Content586 ( talk • contribs) 01:52, 25 June 2010 (UTC) reply
http://www.macquarieinstitute.com.au/pdfs/Are_You_Stressed_Out_Yet.pdf and http://www.emich.edu/cerns/downloads/papers/PoliceStaff/Shift%20Work,%20%20Stress,%20%20Wellness/The%20Maintenance%20of%20Police%20Officer%20Health%20through%20a%20Mandatory%20Wellness%20Program.pdf K2709 ( talk) 20:28, 26 June 2010 (UTC) reply
A few more references from a quick google-scholar search:
One was from NBC World News, which was mainly focused on the Institute of Heartmath and their research, the other was ABC Today Show with Mat Lauer, that was on was about the heart and emotions and talked about the research of the Institute of Heartmath and did a short interview with their Rollin McCraty( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jT5kHw3D7Fk&feature=related). I was also as able to confirm what the Institute representative told me about a new peer reviewed article about Heartmath interventions being used with children diagnosed with ADHD. While the July-August issue of Alternative Therapies was not yet available, they have a link on their site to the peer reviewed Randomized Controlled Trial article title- Coherence Training in Children With Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder: Cognitive Functions and Behavioral Changes: http://www.alternative-therapies.com/index.cfm/fuseaction/Content.Main/id/73/scribd . In light of of this, does anyone feel the organization is non-notable?
I still think the the part of the entry about Technology and emwave/consumer electronics is too much like an advertisement, and that wiki readers would be more interested in knowing about the scope of their peer reviewed research. Perhaps listing the various studies along with verifiable citations would be a much better use of article. Williammichaels ( talk