- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. spam Jimfbleak ( talk) 15:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Infonautics
- Infonautics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant WP:PROMO by a user who has been blocked due to promotional editing. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:G11 as corprate spam. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ KGirlTrucker81: for the record, I tried that. Just Chilling ( talk · contribs) denied the request for some reason... -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ Zackmann08: Oh, maybe is not promo I think but still promotional. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as blatant self promotion. — Mythdon 07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I'd call it a G11 too, but there's no way it'll survive AFD in this condition - David Gerard ( talk) 11:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete. spam Jimfbleak ( talk) 15:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
Infonautics
- Infonautics ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Blatant WP:PROMO by a user who has been blocked due to promotional editing. Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 00:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 01:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy delete per WP:G11 as corprate spam. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 02:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ KGirlTrucker81: for the record, I tried that. Just Chilling ( talk · contribs) denied the request for some reason... -- Zackmann08 ( Talk to me/ What I been doing) 03:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- @ Zackmann08: Oh, maybe is not promo I think but still promotional. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I'm been doing 10:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman ( talk) 06:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete as blatant self promotion. — Mythdon 07:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I'd call it a G11 too, but there's no way it'll survive AFD in this condition - David Gerard ( talk) 11:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.