- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Inexplicable
- Inexplicable ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a dictionary word. There is no coverage for the dictionary word in other sources as being notable for an encyclopedia article. I think Wiktionary already has this, so delete because an encyclopedia article on a word is what a dictionary is supposed to be. 123chess456 ( talk) 03:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A dictionary definition, plus random 'examples' which amount to nothing but speculative WP:OR. Not remotely acceptable as a Wikipedia article. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 03:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:DICDEF. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As above, it seems obvious that this is just an attempt at a longer definition with examples. Dougweller ( talk) 09:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as a dictionary definition. wirenote ( talk) 15:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Indeed. WP:DICDEF. --— Rhododendrites talk | 18:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. There may be some cases where we could build a good encyclopædia article on something that's also a dictionary word, but this isn't one of them. bobrayner ( talk) 20:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Its presence on Wikipedia cannot be explained. I suggest it be redirected to Explanation. Paul B ( talk) 20:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 02:15, 2 June 2014 (UTC)
Inexplicable
- Inexplicable ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This article is a dictionary word. There is no coverage for the dictionary word in other sources as being notable for an encyclopedia article. I think Wiktionary already has this, so delete because an encyclopedia article on a word is what a dictionary is supposed to be. 123chess456 ( talk) 03:24, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. A dictionary definition, plus random 'examples' which amount to nothing but speculative WP:OR. Not remotely acceptable as a Wikipedia article. AndyTheGrump ( talk) 03:32, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:DICDEF. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 06:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete As above, it seems obvious that this is just an attempt at a longer definition with examples. Dougweller ( talk) 09:44, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as a dictionary definition. wirenote ( talk) 15:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete - Indeed. WP:DICDEF. --— Rhododendrites talk | 18:13, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. There may be some cases where we could build a good encyclopædia article on something that's also a dictionary word, but this isn't one of them. bobrayner ( talk) 20:04, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Delete. Its presence on Wikipedia cannot be explained. I suggest it be redirected to Explanation. Paul B ( talk) 20:09, 25 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 13:56, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.