The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this one for deletion because: (1) It gets 4 unique Google hits, none to any university websites, suggesting non notability; (2) when one adds the word " plagiarism" to that Google search, the results come down to zero, suggesting a hoax; (3) it seems to be justifying the great mass of copyvios that get submitted here. (4) It was created by someone with the same username as the author named in the article, suggesting vanity and original research. Delete CanadianCaesar 01:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 23:07, 25 December 2005 (UTC) reply
I'm nominating this one for deletion because: (1) It gets 4 unique Google hits, none to any university websites, suggesting non notability; (2) when one adds the word " plagiarism" to that Google search, the results come down to zero, suggesting a hoax; (3) it seems to be justifying the great mass of copyvios that get submitted here. (4) It was created by someone with the same username as the author named in the article, suggesting vanity and original research. Delete CanadianCaesar 01:03, 19 December 2005 (UTC) reply