The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. ( WP:NPASR). ( Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 12 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Industry Social Service of the State of Rio de Janeiro (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

advertising The Banner  talk 11:51, 19 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 16:17, 19 July 2014 (UTC) reply

People interested in this discussion are invited to take a look at my comment here. Victão Lopes ^Fala! 20:16, 19 July 2014 (UTC) reply

• Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log ( step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2014 July 20. — cyberbot I ^Notify_Online 04:47, 20 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e decker ^talk 19:29, 27 July 2014 (UTC) reply

Please, see comments on this page. Thank you, -- Sistema Firjan ( talk) 12:47, 30 July 2014 (UTC) reply

I would like to inform that I have made some changes in this article so that it is within Wikipedia´s policies. Please, let me know if it is ok now. Thank you, Luis.-- Luis at Sistema FIRJAN ( talk) 18:55, 1 August 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 00:24, 4 August 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep in recognition of the fact that Luis has improved the article over the course of this AfD. If there is still a desire to delete the article, this decision can be revisited at a later date. -- Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:05, 11 August 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.