- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Impulse (software company)
- Impulse (software company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP based on a news search that doesn't have coverage. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks the multiple reliable independent secondary sources needed to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Googling turned up nothing useful. I don't believe the sources exist. Msnicki ( talk) 15:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Hyperbolick ( talk) 15:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing ++ 16:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 22:09, 11 May 2017 (UTC)
Impulse (software company)
- Impulse (software company) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
no evidence of notability DGG ( talk ) 09:07, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:04, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 12:05, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Fails GNG and NCORP based on a news search that doesn't have coverage. KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 14:38, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Lacks the multiple reliable independent secondary sources needed to establish notability under WP:GNG or WP:CORPDEPTH. Googling turned up nothing useful. I don't believe the sources exist. Msnicki ( talk) 15:19, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as non-notable. Hyperbolick ( talk) 15:39, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:52, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Fails WP:CORPDEPTH and GNG -- HighKing ++ 16:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.