The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I don't find sources to support notability,
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG, either under Imagen Ltd or its former name, Cambridge Imaging Systems, primarily press releases and public relations. Several awards had been listed in the article, but they seem to have been non-notable run-of-the-mill industry awards.
Largoplazo (
talk)
16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree with Nom, as I was searching for confirmation of the information, that I eventually removed, I did not find any
WP:RS to justify notability of this organization.
VVikingTalkEdits22:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)reply
It would be great if the page didn't get deleted, the purpose of changes were to include our newest product and ensure a true reflection of the company - no changes were carried out maliciously. I would like the chance to review the page with
WP:NCORP standards in mind. I understand most comments and will rectify within these standards.
Sallen888.sa (
talk)
07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Your remarks demonstrate that you should not be editing this article, even if it remains. See the guidelines on
conflicts of interest and
the use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Wikipedia articles are not to be used as a web presence for their subjects. The additions you've made that I and another editor have removed were inappropriate. All that aside, articles may only be about subjects that meet the
notability guidelines, which I have asserted Imagen Ltd does not. Preventing the article's deletion will require the discussion to conclude that the article is notable, but evidence would have to be presented to support that outcome. You're welcome to submit such evidence if you find it, but you'll have to make that case while this discussion remains open.
Largoplazo (
talk)
11:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete this one now that the litany of products was removed, not much else except funding. This got my interest because a similarly-name company (now defunct, no relation to this one) was started by some of my colleagues
Les Earnest and Luis Trabb-Pardo (credited with the
TPK algorithm) back in the 1980s.
W Nowicki (
talk)
16:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete No indications of notability, Wikipedia is not a marketing or advertising platform, nor the Yellow Pages. I am unable to locate any references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
HighKing++ 21:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
I don't find sources to support notability,
WP:ORG or
WP:GNG, either under Imagen Ltd or its former name, Cambridge Imaging Systems, primarily press releases and public relations. Several awards had been listed in the article, but they seem to have been non-notable run-of-the-mill industry awards.
Largoplazo (
talk)
16:47, 15 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete I agree with Nom, as I was searching for confirmation of the information, that I eventually removed, I did not find any
WP:RS to justify notability of this organization.
VVikingTalkEdits22:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)reply
It would be great if the page didn't get deleted, the purpose of changes were to include our newest product and ensure a true reflection of the company - no changes were carried out maliciously. I would like the chance to review the page with
WP:NCORP standards in mind. I understand most comments and will rectify within these standards.
Sallen888.sa (
talk)
07:53, 16 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Your remarks demonstrate that you should not be editing this article, even if it remains. See the guidelines on
conflicts of interest and
the use of Wikipedia for promotional purposes. Wikipedia articles are not to be used as a web presence for their subjects. The additions you've made that I and another editor have removed were inappropriate. All that aside, articles may only be about subjects that meet the
notability guidelines, which I have asserted Imagen Ltd does not. Preventing the article's deletion will require the discussion to conclude that the article is notable, but evidence would have to be presented to support that outcome. You're welcome to submit such evidence if you find it, but you'll have to make that case while this discussion remains open.
Largoplazo (
talk)
11:39, 16 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete this one now that the litany of products was removed, not much else except funding. This got my interest because a similarly-name company (now defunct, no relation to this one) was started by some of my colleagues
Les Earnest and Luis Trabb-Pardo (credited with the
TPK algorithm) back in the 1980s.
W Nowicki (
talk)
16:50, 21 September 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete No indications of notability, Wikipedia is not a marketing or advertising platform, nor the Yellow Pages. I am unable to locate any references that meet NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
HighKing++ 21:24, 21 September 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.