- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject passes WP:GEOFEAT. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 22:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ilsenburg Factory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Ilsenburg Factory: Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Faktorei Ilsenburg: Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. A Google search yields little more info than its existence and age; nothing describes it in detail. As none of the article's details can be substantiated, I recommend deletion as non-notable. ComplexRational ( talk) 15:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ComplexRational ( talk) 15:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The present article is a translation of the equivalent de.wikipedia article which I have now linked. I also added a couple of references, though I agree with the nominator that these do little more than confirm the age of the building. My "keep" opinion rests on its designation as a cultural monument (see [1]), though I am unfamiliar with the process for designating historic buildings in Germany so would be ok about changing that opinion if someone shows this to be a trivial status. AllyD ( talk) 16:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Heritage-listed building. It is true that Sachsen-Anhalt seems to list a lot of buildings (as can be seen from the large number in this small town alone) and I wouldn't advocate writing an article on every single listed house, but significant standalone buildings like this one are clearly notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. I agree with Necrothesp above. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 00:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per above discussion. NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 19:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Consensus was that the subject passes WP:GEOFEAT. (non-admin closure) Rollidan ( talk) 22:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ilsenburg Factory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Ilsenburg Factory: Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
- (Faktorei Ilsenburg: Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
No evidence of notability. A Google search yields little more info than its existence and age; nothing describes it in detail. As none of the article's details can be substantiated, I recommend deletion as non-notable. ComplexRational ( talk) 15:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ComplexRational ( talk) 15:19, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Lightburst ( talk) 15:28, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: The present article is a translation of the equivalent de.wikipedia article which I have now linked. I also added a couple of references, though I agree with the nominator that these do little more than confirm the age of the building. My "keep" opinion rests on its designation as a cultural monument (see [1]), though I am unfamiliar with the process for designating historic buildings in Germany so would be ok about changing that opinion if someone shows this to be a trivial status. AllyD ( talk) 16:14, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. Heritage-listed building. It is true that Sachsen-Anhalt seems to list a lot of buildings (as can be seen from the large number in this small town alone) and I wouldn't advocate writing an article on every single listed house, but significant standalone buildings like this one are clearly notable. -- Necrothesp ( talk) 13:39, 13 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per WP:GEOFEAT. I agree with Necrothesp above. -- Matthiaspaul ( talk) 00:36, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- Keep per above discussion. NNADIGOODLUCK ( Talk| Contribs) 19:53, 18 November 2019 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.