The result was withdrawn by nominator. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 14:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC) reply
This surprisingly old article appears to have started out as a redirect to an article about magic. At some point it was redirected to an illusionism article about art and then finally was given its basic current content from a contributor who has neither before or since made any further contributions, nor provided any sources. Essentially this is a mix of lacking notability, verifiability, and possibly a case of original research. The term ‘illusionism’ is itself a rhetorical device used in many different contexts (just look at a Google ‘books’ search). I could only find two standard g-search results using ‘Illusionism’ with the article's definition and both appear to be a reflection of the Wikipedia article. Buddy23Lee ( talk) 23:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm on the fence for notability, but as a philosophical term this is verifiable. Them From Space 03:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was withdrawn by nominator. NAC— S Marshall T/ C 14:54, 24 December 2012 (UTC) reply
This surprisingly old article appears to have started out as a redirect to an article about magic. At some point it was redirected to an illusionism article about art and then finally was given its basic current content from a contributor who has neither before or since made any further contributions, nor provided any sources. Essentially this is a mix of lacking notability, verifiability, and possibly a case of original research. The term ‘illusionism’ is itself a rhetorical device used in many different contexts (just look at a Google ‘books’ search). I could only find two standard g-search results using ‘Illusionism’ with the article's definition and both appear to be a reflection of the Wikipedia article. Buddy23Lee ( talk) 23:39, 17 December 2012 (UTC) reply
I'm on the fence for notability, but as a philosophical term this is verifiable. Them From Space 03:53, 18 December 2012 (UTC) reply