- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Ile-de-France Region Waste Management Observatory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ile-de-France Region Waste Management Observatory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organization that cites no sources and fails WP:GNG. No additional (non-wiki) sources could be found with a WP:BEFORE search TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and France. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete Although the ref section is vacant, written like a PR purpose, can find few of the sources with passing mentions, but still fails WP:NONPROFIT. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 02:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No references in fourteen years for this apparently self-published page? Rhadow ( talk) 09:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 19:29, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
Ile-de-France Region Waste Management Observatory
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Ile-de-France Region Waste Management Observatory ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Organization that cites no sources and fails WP:GNG. No additional (non-wiki) sources could be found with a WP:BEFORE search TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. TheManInTheBlackHat (Talk) 20:49, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Environment and France. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 22:17, 29 January 2023 (UTC)
- Weak delete Although the ref section is vacant, written like a PR purpose, can find few of the sources with passing mentions, but still fails WP:NONPROFIT. M.Ashraf333 ( talk) 02:50, 30 January 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:04, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete No references in fourteen years for this apparently self-published page? Rhadow ( talk) 09:55, 6 February 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.