The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Missvain (
talk) 00:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Gscholar gives
h-index in low single digits, nothing indicates passing
WP:PROF on any other grounds. The article is rather promotional. The photo appears to be a copyvio.
Nsk92 (
talk) 01:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
delete per nom. fails
WP:SCHOLAR, no other avenue for notability is evident from the article. --
hroest 02:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not pass NACADEMIC and does not have SIGCOV.--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 10:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, no evidence of
WP:PROF notability, possibly created with promotional intent. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing meeting any of the NPROF criteria; additionally, it lists him as a "physician" in the infobox, which is not supported by the article...
JoelleJay (
talk) 22:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Missvain (
talk) 00:46, 13 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Gscholar gives
h-index in low single digits, nothing indicates passing
WP:PROF on any other grounds. The article is rather promotional. The photo appears to be a copyvio.
Nsk92 (
talk) 01:12, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
delete per nom. fails
WP:SCHOLAR, no other avenue for notability is evident from the article. --
hroest 02:42, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, does not pass NACADEMIC and does not have SIGCOV.--Eostrix (
🦉 hoothoot🦉) 10:10, 6 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete, no evidence of
WP:PROF notability, possibly created with promotional intent. —
David Eppstein (
talk) 06:10, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
Delete. Nothing meeting any of the NPROF criteria; additionally, it lists him as a "physician" in the infobox, which is not supported by the article...
JoelleJay (
talk) 22:29, 8 May 2021 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.