The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I came across this via a PROD and after cleaning it up a little (you can see the original format here) and searching for sources, I couldn't find anything to show that this indie book passes WP:NBOOK. The original version used various unreliable sources such as merchant links, non-notable blog entries, and social media review sites such as Goodreads, none of which can really show notability. There was an assertion that the book was reviewed through the Glasgow Evening Times, but I can't find anything to back this up. Even if it can be located, all we have are two reviews. This just isn't enough to pass notability guidelines for books. The PROD was removed and the original editor is going to try to find some sources, but I really couldn't find anything out there that would meet the guidelines of WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)
The result was delete. Mark Arsten ( talk) 03:10, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
I came across this via a PROD and after cleaning it up a little (you can see the original format here) and searching for sources, I couldn't find anything to show that this indie book passes WP:NBOOK. The original version used various unreliable sources such as merchant links, non-notable blog entries, and social media review sites such as Goodreads, none of which can really show notability. There was an assertion that the book was reviewed through the Glasgow Evening Times, but I can't find anything to back this up. Even if it can be located, all we have are two reviews. This just isn't enough to pass notability guidelines for books. The PROD was removed and the original editor is going to try to find some sources, but I really couldn't find anything out there that would meet the guidelines of WP:RS. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 09:28, 22 January 2014 (UTC)