From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Idle Theme Park Tycoon

Idle Theme Park Tycoon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. No signs of significant coverage; fails WP:GNG.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • KEEP Follows all guidelines and is correct in information Thursby16 ( talk)
@ Thursby16: The Idle Theme Park Tycoon has not met the General notability guideline. This is because the topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If you could demonstrate how it does I will happily change my mind. In regards to your second point, I suggest reading this essay: WP:BUTITSTRUE. Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tone 20:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Idle Theme Park Tycoon

Idle Theme Park Tycoon (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable game. No signs of significant coverage; fails WP:GNG.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions.  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 17:49, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply
  • KEEP Follows all guidelines and is correct in information Thursby16 ( talk)
@ Thursby16: The Idle Theme Park Tycoon has not met the General notability guideline. This is because the topic has not received significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. If you could demonstrate how it does I will happily change my mind. In regards to your second point, I suggest reading this essay: WP:BUTITSTRUE. Regards  Spy-cicle💥  Talk? 22:46, 9 January 2020 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook