![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 February 18. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
failed prod with the reasoning "lack of sources is not a valid reason for deleting an article. This topic passes the google test with 639,000 results." Google hits is not reliable, especially since as mentioned almost all are fansites, unreliable sources or primary sources and thus does not pass notability and probably not verifiability. It is also made up almost entirely of original research. じん ない 03:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
-- BarkerJr ( talk) 04:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
-- Tothwolf ( talk) 07:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
![]() | This discussion was subject to a
deletion review on 2009 February 18. For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review. |
The result was delete. MBisanz talk 03:08, 13 February 2009 (UTC) reply
failed prod with the reasoning "lack of sources is not a valid reason for deleting an article. This topic passes the google test with 639,000 results." Google hits is not reliable, especially since as mentioned almost all are fansites, unreliable sources or primary sources and thus does not pass notability and probably not verifiability. It is also made up almost entirely of original research. じん ない 03:29, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
-- BarkerJr ( talk) 04:44, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply
-- Tothwolf ( talk) 07:59, 8 February 2009 (UTC) reply