The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 11:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm also nominating the following similar articles for deletion
None of these articles, mostly worked on by the same user, meet
notability guidelines. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a
memorial. Rightly or wrongly, we cannot have articles about every single rape / murder victim in the world. While attempts have been made to portray these as significant murders (note that most of the text is strikingly similar i.e.
the lack of any significant media coverage of the incidents apart from the initial crime reports, plus the lack of unique Google hits (25 ghits [1], 113 ghits [2], 69 ghits [3], 133 ghits [4] and 24 ghits [5] respectively - most of them Wiki mirrors) suggests that all five articles fail Wikipedia's notability guidelines. snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 15:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment. The so called same user as alluded above is me and I have tried to cite as to why these cases are WP:Notable. The AFD was done while I was on Wiki break by the above user who has a history of conflict with me for the last one year and he/she is in conflict mediation in at least 2 articles currently that involves me. I am really glad that these articles have bben nominated for AFD as it gives the wiki community a chance to look at them and decide for good whether these articles are worthy of keep or delete. I would request the closing admin to keep an eye on for cabal activity and look at the reasons for delete or keep only from neutral uninvolved editors and the reasons provided as opposed to simple math. Thanks Taprobanus 21:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. - Mailer Diablo 11:22, 29 May 2007 (UTC) reply
I'm also nominating the following similar articles for deletion
None of these articles, mostly worked on by the same user, meet
notability guidelines. I'm sorry, but Wikipedia is not a
memorial. Rightly or wrongly, we cannot have articles about every single rape / murder victim in the world. While attempts have been made to portray these as significant murders (note that most of the text is strikingly similar i.e.
the lack of any significant media coverage of the incidents apart from the initial crime reports, plus the lack of unique Google hits (25 ghits [1], 113 ghits [2], 69 ghits [3], 133 ghits [4] and 24 ghits [5] respectively - most of them Wiki mirrors) suggests that all five articles fail Wikipedia's notability guidelines. snowolfD4( talk / @ ) 15:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC) reply
Comment. The so called same user as alluded above is me and I have tried to cite as to why these cases are WP:Notable. The AFD was done while I was on Wiki break by the above user who has a history of conflict with me for the last one year and he/she is in conflict mediation in at least 2 articles currently that involves me. I am really glad that these articles have bben nominated for AFD as it gives the wiki community a chance to look at them and decide for good whether these articles are worthy of keep or delete. I would request the closing admin to keep an eye on for cabal activity and look at the reasons for delete or keep only from neutral uninvolved editors and the reasons provided as opposed to simple math. Thanks Taprobanus 21:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC) reply