- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ian Martin (writer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has contributed to various shows, but no real evidence presented of the importance of his role in the various writing teams. His one individual work, Coalition chronicles has only 27 worldcat holdings, DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I think it's a bit too soon. I am not seeing substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral, but how is it "too soon"? How is further reliable coverage bound to appear later? Tezero ( talk) 04:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Appears to meet WP:GNG. LordFixit ( talk) 08:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: though there are WP:LOTSOFSOURCES, some are not independent of him, and the reliable sources only really mention him, not discuss him in depth. Therefore I do not believe it meets WP:GNG. BethNaught ( talk) 08:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 17:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Ian Martin (writer) ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Has contributed to various shows, but no real evidence presented of the importance of his role in the various writing teams. His one individual work, Coalition chronicles has only 27 worldcat holdings, DGG ( talk ) 01:09, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete I think it's a bit too soon. I am not seeing substantial coverage in reliable independent sources. Candleabracadabra ( talk) 03:12, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:16, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 03:17, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Neutral, but how is it "too soon"? How is further reliable coverage bound to appear later? Tezero ( talk) 04:25, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Keep: Appears to meet WP:GNG. LordFixit ( talk) 08:43, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete: though there are WP:LOTSOFSOURCES, some are not independent of him, and the reliable sources only really mention him, not discuss him in depth. Therefore I do not believe it meets WP:GNG. BethNaught ( talk) 08:59, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.