The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Blatant vanity bio. Appears to have a lot of sources, yet none demonstrate depth of coverage whatsoever (one reference, for example, does nothing other than quote him along with several other randomly chosen readers, on how they like the newspaper's new layout). Prod was disputed, most likely by subject. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:39, 30 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Blatant vanity bio. Appears to have a lot of sources, yet none demonstrate depth of coverage whatsoever (one reference, for example, does nothing other than quote him along with several other randomly chosen readers, on how they like the newspaper's new layout). Prod was disputed, most likely by subject. OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:08, 22 July 2012 (UTC) reply