The result was redirect to Green computing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Article was deprodded for WP:NEO, but the concern still exists. Reading over the citations they are passing mentions, or make no mention at all of the specific term, "IT Efficiency." For instance, the New York Times article linked makes no mention of the term at all. Other articles refer to "Green IT." So it does not appear, "IT Efficiency" warrants an article on its own, and it appears to be WP:NEO. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 15:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was redirect to Green computing. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:19, 30 September 2011 (UTC) reply
Article was deprodded for WP:NEO, but the concern still exists. Reading over the citations they are passing mentions, or make no mention at all of the specific term, "IT Efficiency." For instance, the New York Times article linked makes no mention of the term at all. Other articles refer to "Green IT." So it does not appear, "IT Efficiency" warrants an article on its own, and it appears to be WP:NEO. ConcernedVancouverite ( talk) 15:35, 23 September 2011 (UTC) reply