The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines. Also, enough is enough. I recommend that every page created by
User:Ctway and socks be automatically deleted. It would save us the trouble of doing it one by one.--
RAF910 (
talk) 06:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: Should we considering merging the ITM firearm related articles into a single "ITM Tool and Die" article, since the company was apparently still extant back in 2009? By the way, the deletion page links for the ITM Model 4 & ITM Model 5 articles are pointing to this page for some reason (ignore this if deliberate).
Ceannlann gorm (
talk) 18:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, it's deliberate, I bundled the nomination per
WP:MULTIAFD. And yes, if there is enough in terms of
WP:RS for the company, information can be merged there - but I'm not seeing it.
ansh666 01:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Highly obscure, probably all just prototypes. --
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 18:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:52, 26 February 2016 (UTC)reply
DELETE...Dead end, one of a kind experimental weapons, with limited or no supporting references to establish notability do not meet guidelines. Also, enough is enough. I recommend that every page created by
User:Ctway and socks be automatically deleted. It would save us the trouble of doing it one by one.--
RAF910 (
talk) 06:23, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Comment: Should we considering merging the ITM firearm related articles into a single "ITM Tool and Die" article, since the company was apparently still extant back in 2009? By the way, the deletion page links for the ITM Model 4 & ITM Model 5 articles are pointing to this page for some reason (ignore this if deliberate).
Ceannlann gorm (
talk) 18:04, 10 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Yes, it's deliberate, I bundled the nomination per
WP:MULTIAFD. And yes, if there is enough in terms of
WP:RS for the company, information can be merged there - but I'm not seeing it.
ansh666 01:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
UY ScutiTalk 17:13, 17 February 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Highly obscure, probably all just prototypes. --
Mr. Magoo (
talk) 18:40, 21 February 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.