- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
IServer
- IServer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, removed with no rationale. Reason was: " I do not consider an "honourable mention" to confirm WP:N. This needs further referencing to confirm that it has notability. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42" Fiddle Faddle 13:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Multiple searches found nothing that appears significant and notable (mostly press releases) here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 21:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking coverage in multiple independent sources. The two Garner papers can't be accessed, so the depth of coverage is unclear. The only relevant RSN discussion on Gartner suggests that these are reliable, but on their own, the Garner sources are not sufficient to establish notability. A search turned up incidental mentions and company PR, but no further significant RS coverage. Dialectric ( talk) 00:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. j⚛e decker talk 00:15, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
IServer
- IServer ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD, removed with no rationale. Reason was: " I do not consider an "honourable mention" to confirm WP:N. This needs further referencing to confirm that it has notability. We require references from significant coverage about the topic of the article, and independent of it, and in WP:RS please. See WP:42" Fiddle Faddle 13:19, 14 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 17:32, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Delete - Multiple searches found nothing that appears significant and notable (mostly press releases) here, here, here and here. SwisterTwister talk 21:41, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
- Weak Delete - Software article of unclear notability, lacking coverage in multiple independent sources. The two Garner papers can't be accessed, so the depth of coverage is unclear. The only relevant RSN discussion on Gartner suggests that these are reliable, but on their own, the Garner sources are not sufficient to establish notability. A search turned up incidental mentions and company PR, but no further significant RS coverage. Dialectric ( talk) 00:18, 20 May 2015 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.