From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC) reply

ISKCON Temple, Mumbai

ISKCON Temple, Mumbai (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of detailed coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NBUILDING. Search only gives promotional press statements. This temple fails WP:NORG. No asserted notability or indication why this temple is notable to have its own article. Lack of detailed coverage in reliable media. Unsourced promtional article, part of ISKCON spam on Wikipedia. (See similar recent AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Salem and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Ujjain) Venkat TL ( talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC) reply

ISKCON Temple, Mumbai

ISKCON Temple, Mumbai (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of detailed coverage in reliable sources. Fails WP:NBUILDING. Search only gives promotional press statements. This temple fails WP:NORG. No asserted notability or indication why this temple is notable to have its own article. Lack of detailed coverage in reliable media. Unsourced promtional article, part of ISKCON spam on Wikipedia. (See similar recent AfD Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Salem and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ISKCON Temple, Ujjain) Venkat TL ( talk) 16:09, 20 March 2022 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook