The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 08:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
But that article is not up for deletion - this is. Where is the "significant coverage" of this particular award in reliable, third-party sources, as required by
WP:GNG? Why does it deserve a separate article from the main IFFHS page?
GiantSnowman 14:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - per
WP:NOTSTATS. Perhaps worthy of discussion on the organisation's page.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, and Fenix. WP:NOTSTATS.
SW3 5DL (
talk) 23:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per Fayçal.09's indication that the IFFHS is an organisation capable of producing notable materials. Article is succinct although perhaps the continents might be alphabetised or an explanation of the order of the lists might be given. The links system on the IFFHS' page looks servicable. Copyright seems to be main negative argument if valid
Gregkaye (
talk) 10:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Gregkaye: - no-one is doubting that IFFHS as an organisation is notable; so please can you show why this particular sub-article justifies a separate article?
GiantSnowman 12:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Note: This discussion has been included in
WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions.
GiantSnowman 08:34, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
But that article is not up for deletion - this is. Where is the "significant coverage" of this particular award in reliable, third-party sources, as required by
WP:GNG? Why does it deserve a separate article from the main IFFHS page?
GiantSnowman 14:12, 7 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete - per
WP:NOTSTATS. Perhaps worthy of discussion on the organisation's page.
Fenix down (
talk) 15:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom, and Fenix. WP:NOTSTATS.
SW3 5DL (
talk) 23:45, 15 June 2014 (UTC)reply
Keep per Fayçal.09's indication that the IFFHS is an organisation capable of producing notable materials. Article is succinct although perhaps the continents might be alphabetised or an explanation of the order of the lists might be given. The links system on the IFFHS' page looks servicable. Copyright seems to be main negative argument if valid
Gregkaye (
talk) 10:49, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
@
Gregkaye: - no-one is doubting that IFFHS as an organisation is notable; so please can you show why this particular sub-article justifies a separate article?
GiantSnowman 12:11, 17 June 2014 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.