The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ansh666 07:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Few of the claims made in the article can be referenced with independent, reliable sources. Appears to fail
WP:NCORP and is full of
weasel words e.g. high-profile, brand new event etc. A7 declined on the grounds that while it may fail
WP:NCORP a
WP:CCS is given. DrStrausstalk 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Question--perhaps it would be a good idea to expand "few of the claims" Which of the claims can be reliably sourced and which not? DGG (
talk ) 01:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as it stands; entirely promotional & no 3rd party references. There may be a notable topic here somewhere (of which I'm not yet convinced), but this article ain't it. Borders on G11 and no value to the project at this time.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 00:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
ansh666 07:44, 7 October 2017 (UTC)reply
Few of the claims made in the article can be referenced with independent, reliable sources. Appears to fail
WP:NCORP and is full of
weasel words e.g. high-profile, brand new event etc. A7 declined on the grounds that while it may fail
WP:NCORP a
WP:CCS is given. DrStrausstalk 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Question--perhaps it would be a good idea to expand "few of the claims" Which of the claims can be reliably sourced and which not? DGG (
talk ) 01:09, 30 September 2017 (UTC)reply
Delete as it stands; entirely promotional & no 3rd party references. There may be a notable topic here somewhere (of which I'm not yet convinced), but this article ain't it. Borders on G11 and no value to the project at this time.
K.e.coffman (
talk) 00:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.