The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Stifle (
talk) 14:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)reply
comment I haven't yet done my own search for sources. From the description this could be notable, but clear evidence of that is needed.
DES(talk) 02:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - the SPA has now added some references but none of them appear to demonstrate the required notability.--
ukexpat (
talk) 12:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: sources are primary; press releases, pseudo-press releases, brief mentions. Interesting comment
here about the org.'s PR push...I guess Wikipedia articles are part of the strategy.
Vrac (
talk) 12:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Hmm perhaps that should be cited in the article, is studyrama.com a
WP:RS do you know?
DES(talk) 16:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
No, it's an example of what I meant by a pseudo-press release, what they call a "publi-reportage" in French, it's basically a press release made to look like a news story. Language such as this "[le logo]...souligne le dynamisme et le caractère innovant de l’école. Les majuscules transmettent les notions de stabilité et de fiabilité d’une institution de qualité" is a good example, not the kind of thing an RS would write. (Apologies for the French if you don't speak that language, Google translate will still give you the gist...)
Vrac (
talk) 16:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. Vrac's comment on "publi-reportage" is also very telling. Search turned up no noticeable coverage.
Onel5969TT me 14:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Stifle (
talk) 14:59, 14 August 2015 (UTC)reply
comment I haven't yet done my own search for sources. From the description this could be notable, but clear evidence of that is needed.
DES(talk) 02:34, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Comment - the SPA has now added some references but none of them appear to demonstrate the required notability.--
ukexpat (
talk) 12:46, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete: sources are primary; press releases, pseudo-press releases, brief mentions. Interesting comment
here about the org.'s PR push...I guess Wikipedia articles are part of the strategy.
Vrac (
talk) 12:56, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Hmm perhaps that should be cited in the article, is studyrama.com a
WP:RS do you know?
DES(talk) 16:19, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
No, it's an example of what I meant by a pseudo-press release, what they call a "publi-reportage" in French, it's basically a press release made to look like a news story. Language such as this "[le logo]...souligne le dynamisme et le caractère innovant de l’école. Les majuscules transmettent les notions de stabilité et de fiabilité d’une institution de qualité" is a good example, not the kind of thing an RS would write. (Apologies for the French if you don't speak that language, Google translate will still give you the gist...)
Vrac (
talk) 16:42, 7 August 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete as per nom. Vrac's comment on "publi-reportage" is also very telling. Search turned up no noticeable coverage.
Onel5969TT me 14:32, 13 August 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.