The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Nakon 03:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Company is wholly unremarkable. Only sources (very few reliable ones) available discuss its acquisition and its new CEO, nothing more. Sources cited are not extensive and are of poor reliability. Article was created bypassing several AfC declines.
FoCuSandLeArN (
talk) 20:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 00:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 03:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: I was surprised to see an AFD for a firm with 900 employees. There's plenty of source material in respected publications, like AdAge
[1][2][3]CorporateM (
Talk) 05:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and the fact it reads like a promo, IMHO it needs
WP:BLOWNUP and rewritten. –
Davey2010Talk 19:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete I'd like to see better than the sources given above, per
WP:CORPDEPTH. --
j⚛e deckertalk 00:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete.
Nakon 03:07, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Fails WP:CORP and WP:GNG. Company is wholly unremarkable. Only sources (very few reliable ones) available discuss its acquisition and its new CEO, nothing more. Sources cited are not extensive and are of poor reliability. Article was created bypassing several AfC declines.
FoCuSandLeArN (
talk) 20:39, 19 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —
Coffee //
have a cup //
beans // 00:47, 27 March 2015 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
Spirit of Eagle (
talk) 03:12, 3 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep: I was surprised to see an AFD for a firm with 900 employees. There's plenty of source material in respected publications, like AdAge
[1][2][3]CorporateM (
Talk) 05:21, 8 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete per nom and the fact it reads like a promo, IMHO it needs
WP:BLOWNUP and rewritten. –
Davey2010Talk 19:54, 10 April 2015 (UTC)reply
Delete I'd like to see better than the sources given above, per
WP:CORPDEPTH. --
j⚛e deckertalk 00:35, 12 April 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.