The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Not sure where "4 times in 2015" is coming from, as it appears to continue to be used as recently as last week, and it receives in-depth coverage in academic literature, eg
[1].
Nikkimaria (
talk) 15:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The BBC and Atlanic articles are pretty in-depth, not puff pieces, and discuss the subject as being part of wider issues around copyright and open access, I'd consider that to be
SIGCOV. --
D'n'B-t -- 18:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: It is notable and reliably sourced. WC gudang inspirasi (Read!Talk!) 01:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Doing a quick search, the hashtag is completely notable; many in-depth references exist beyond the cited ones.
Dr. Swag Lord (
talk) 00:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep. Not sure where "4 times in 2015" is coming from, as it appears to continue to be used as recently as last week, and it receives in-depth coverage in academic literature, eg
[1].
Nikkimaria (
talk) 15:38, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: The BBC and Atlanic articles are pretty in-depth, not puff pieces, and discuss the subject as being part of wider issues around copyright and open access, I'd consider that to be
SIGCOV. --
D'n'B-t -- 18:20, 1 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: It is notable and reliably sourced. WC gudang inspirasi (Read!Talk!) 01:31, 6 June 2024 (UTC)reply
Keep: Doing a quick search, the hashtag is completely notable; many in-depth references exist beyond the cited ones.
Dr. Swag Lord (
talk) 00:55, 7 June 2024 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.