The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are clearly unfounded in policy and practice. Sandstein 05:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Non-notable software; has zero third-party sources and searching online showed none either. Article fails WP:GNG Sudo Ghost 23:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
First off, thank you for the alert on this discussion. I am not sure why this article on ICEpdf is being nominated for deletion? The note mentions that the produce (ICEpdf) lacks third-party sources - this is something we are working on developing. What would you recommend for changes until we can establish online presence for third-party sources? Also, please provide recommendations for third-party sources of which you require to include in the article that it becomes notable software?
-- Fnasser007 ( talk) 23:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. The "keep" opinions are clearly unfounded in policy and practice. Sandstein 05:27, 6 July 2012 (UTC) reply
Contested PROD. Non-notable software; has zero third-party sources and searching online showed none either. Article fails WP:GNG Sudo Ghost 23:26, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply
First off, thank you for the alert on this discussion. I am not sure why this article on ICEpdf is being nominated for deletion? The note mentions that the produce (ICEpdf) lacks third-party sources - this is something we are working on developing. What would you recommend for changes until we can establish online presence for third-party sources? Also, please provide recommendations for third-party sources of which you require to include in the article that it becomes notable software?
-- Fnasser007 ( talk) 23:43, 28 June 2012 (UTC) reply