- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 12:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- I-494 Minnesota River Bridge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A WP:MILL unnamed highway bridge. Nothing notable in the description. One source is looks like an individuals blog, the other are certainly not independent. Insufficient in-depth independent coverage in RS, does not meet WP:GNG MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- delete Seems to be an ordinary deck plate highway bridge, with no claim for notability in the article. Mangoe ( talk) 03:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteRedirect to the list per WP:Mill and GNG. Your standard highway bridge, of which there are millions on the United States. Also doesn't seem to have garnered coverage outside of the blogosphere and a few Minnesota DOT primary sources. Hog Farm Bacon 04:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC). Didn't see the list, redirect to where mentioned as a logical search term. Hog Farm Bacon 00:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)- Delete not notable Devokewater ( talk) 09:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteNo claim of significance. Bingobro (Chat) 14:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)- Redirect Well, this list exists so, it'd be better to redirect this to the list per WP:ATD-R. Bingobro (Chat) 14:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unsure The pedestrian walkway is unique on an interstate bridge in 1982, and the said blogger is a bridge engineer of some sort. Is there a notability guideline for bridges? Looks as though the author was attempting to work on this list: List of crossings of the Minnesota River Comm260 ncu ( talk) 14:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think bridges are judged under GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 17:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River, the right target, since alternatives to deletion are best.23:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River, it is covered in a table there, so redirecting is the best choice. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 00:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River. (non-admin closure) ( t · c) buidhe 12:56, 14 July 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- I-494 Minnesota River Bridge ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A WP:MILL unnamed highway bridge. Nothing notable in the description. One source is looks like an individuals blog, the other are certainly not independent. Insufficient in-depth independent coverage in RS, does not meet WP:GNG MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Transportation-related deletion discussions. MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Minnesota-related deletion discussions. MB 02:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- delete Seems to be an ordinary deck plate highway bridge, with no claim for notability in the article. Mangoe ( talk) 03:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteRedirect to the list per WP:Mill and GNG. Your standard highway bridge, of which there are millions on the United States. Also doesn't seem to have garnered coverage outside of the blogosphere and a few Minnesota DOT primary sources. Hog Farm Bacon 04:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC). Didn't see the list, redirect to where mentioned as a logical search term. Hog Farm Bacon 00:25, 11 July 2020 (UTC)- Delete not notable Devokewater ( talk) 09:59, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
DeleteNo claim of significance. Bingobro (Chat) 14:09, 6 July 2020 (UTC)- Redirect Well, this list exists so, it'd be better to redirect this to the list per WP:ATD-R. Bingobro (Chat) 14:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- Unsure The pedestrian walkway is unique on an interstate bridge in 1982, and the said blogger is a bridge engineer of some sort. Is there a notability guideline for bridges? Looks as though the author was attempting to work on this list: List of crossings of the Minnesota River Comm260 ncu ( talk) 14:40, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- I think bridges are judged under GNG. Hog Farm Bacon 17:15, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River, the right target, since alternatives to deletion are best.23:38, 6 July 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp ( talk) 17:24, 7 July 2020 (UTC)
- Redirect to List of crossings of the Minnesota River, it is covered in a table there, so redirecting is the best choice. Devonian Wombat ( talk) 00:22, 11 July 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.