- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK3/snow. No prejudice against any hypothetical move or redirects from the mentioned redlink or another name. Or a renom that actually looks plausible, for that matter. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hybolasiopsis abnormalis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hybolasiopsis abnormalis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N and WP:SPECIES as it doesn't have a valid name. Hongsy ( talk) 05:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, referenced and meets ToL guidelines. Per what source is this not a valid name?-- Kev min § 05:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The species existed in terms of WP:NSPECIES, but given its synonym is also Xylotoles abnormalis [1], and it appears there was some renaming going on recently. [2] That source combined Xylotoles abnormalis among other names into Hybolasiopsis abnormalis. Maybe there's been more changes going on I couldn't find, but this is a case for a redirect at most to the current name, not deletion. KoA ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Species, if they are real and are cited to their original author who described them, are basically always notable. Species articles should not be brought to AfD unless there is a specific problem, such as the species is a hoax. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - notable. Meets WP:NSPECIES
- Move – This name appears to be a synonym of Hybolasiopsis trigonellaris, according to doi: 10.1080/00779962.2008.9722170. Esculenta ( talk) 21:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy keep. WP:SK3/snow. No prejudice against any hypothetical move or redirects from the mentioned redlink or another name. Or a renom that actually looks plausible, for that matter. (non-admin closure) Alpha3031 ( t • c) 10:42, 29 October 2023 (UTC)
Hybolasiopsis abnormalis
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Hybolasiopsis abnormalis ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Does not meet WP:N and WP:SPECIES as it doesn't have a valid name. Hongsy ( talk) 05:03, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Oppose, referenced and meets ToL guidelines. Per what source is this not a valid name?-- Kev min § 05:41, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Animal and Organisms. Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:19, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep The species existed in terms of WP:NSPECIES, but given its synonym is also Xylotoles abnormalis [1], and it appears there was some renaming going on recently. [2] That source combined Xylotoles abnormalis among other names into Hybolasiopsis abnormalis. Maybe there's been more changes going on I couldn't find, but this is a case for a redirect at most to the current name, not deletion. KoA ( talk) 20:59, 26 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - Species, if they are real and are cited to their original author who described them, are basically always notable. Species articles should not be brought to AfD unless there is a specific problem, such as the species is a hoax. Chiswick Chap ( talk) 16:41, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- Keep - notable. Meets WP:NSPECIES
- Move – This name appears to be a synonym of Hybolasiopsis trigonellaris, according to doi: 10.1080/00779962.2008.9722170. Esculenta ( talk) 21:03, 28 October 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.