The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. Speedy deleted ( G11) by FreeRangeFrog. ( non-admin closure) Jim Carter (from public cyber) 19:55, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Huttu savina nanthara

Huttu savina nanthara (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

its sources are unreliable. Muazim Balwan ( talk) 06:14, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply

• It's clearly spam / advertising; should be speedied under G11 in my opinion. Pmlineditor ( t · c · l) 06:16, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete. Even if there's a notable topic here, which I doubt, the current content should go. -- Michig ( talk) 06:46, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Per WP:NOT Reads like an advert. 220 of ^Borg 08:45, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:48, 29 September 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.