The result was keep. Overall consensus among editors is in favor of keeping the articles. In addition, comments by multiple users are correct in assessing that there is reliable secondary source coverage of these topics. Further, at least one editor is also right in stating that multiple of these sources could be used to improve quality of the listed articles up to at least WP:GA rated quality status. -- Cirt ( talk) 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I do not believe this article meets the guidelines as laid out in Wikipedia:Television episodes. Some sources are given, as with all the episodes from this season of House, but those aren't independent, significant discussions of the topic as required by our notability guidelines. The article has been tagged for notability and as unreferenced since April 2010, and consists, like the others in this season, of only plot, infobox, and templates. Drmies ( talk) 20:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. Overall consensus among editors is in favor of keeping the articles. In addition, comments by multiple users are correct in assessing that there is reliable secondary source coverage of these topics. Further, at least one editor is also right in stating that multiple of these sources could be used to improve quality of the listed articles up to at least WP:GA rated quality status. -- Cirt ( talk) 16:25, 5 October 2010 (UTC) reply
I do not believe this article meets the guidelines as laid out in Wikipedia:Television episodes. Some sources are given, as with all the episodes from this season of House, but those aren't independent, significant discussions of the topic as required by our notability guidelines. The article has been tagged for notability and as unreferenced since April 2010, and consists, like the others in this season, of only plot, infobox, and templates. Drmies ( talk) 20:05, 23 September 2010 (UTC) reply