The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sources aren't amazing but I'd say there's enough for it to pass GNG (just!) (
non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 01:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NALBUMS. "Articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to into the artist's article or discography."
Flat Out (
talk) 23:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the group. Nothing here really but a tracklisting. --
Michig (
talk) 07:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep now has access to 3 reviews, passes WP:NALBUMS.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 01:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC) It could be expanded to start class.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 07:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Minimal coverage from Triple J - doesn't really review the album, more just stating that it exists. Is urbansmarts.com a reliable source? --
Michig (
talk) 18:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Added two more reviews from mainstream newspapers.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep sufficient independent reliable sources to establish notability in its own right.
Dan arndt (
talk) 13:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Sources aren't amazing but I'd say there's enough for it to pass GNG (just!) (
non-admin closure) –
Davey2010Talk 01:59, 8 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Fails
WP:NALBUMS. "Articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to into the artist's article or discography."
Flat Out (
talk) 23:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Redirect to the group. Nothing here really but a tracklisting. --
Michig (
talk) 07:17, 2 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep now has access to 3 reviews, passes WP:NALBUMS.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 01:55, 3 November 2015 (UTC) It could be expanded to start class.
shaidar cuebiyar (
talk) 07:50, 3 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Minimal coverage from Triple J - doesn't really review the album, more just stating that it exists. Is urbansmarts.com a reliable source? --
Michig (
talk) 18:20, 3 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep. Added two more reviews from mainstream newspapers.
duffbeerforme (
talk) 12:33, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
Keep sufficient independent reliable sources to establish notability in its own right.
Dan arndt (
talk) 13:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.