The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mkdw talk 22:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Notes: The keep camp argues enough of WP:NSONG has been met including WP:N. The delete camp has legitimate concerns about the quality of sources but it does not change the fact that the song is notable under Wiki guidelines. A merge argument was mentioned but against WP:NSONG repeated content is a content editing issue and the article at present appears to have enough for a standalone article. Mkdw talk 23:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage, and the section that has significant coverage derives from a primary source. Everything else is in the context of the album. Till 00:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep – Clearly within the scope of expansion and notable as a standalone individual article. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:59, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply
The result was keep. ( non-admin closure) Mkdw talk 22:21, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Notes: The keep camp argues enough of WP:NSONG has been met including WP:N. The delete camp has legitimate concerns about the quality of sources but it does not change the fact that the song is notable under Wiki guidelines. A merge argument was mentioned but against WP:NSONG repeated content is a content editing issue and the article at present appears to have enough for a standalone article. Mkdw talk 23:28, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply
Fails WP:GNG. No significant coverage, and the section that has significant coverage derives from a primary source. Everything else is in the context of the album. Till 00:10, 25 February 2013 (UTC) reply
Keep – Clearly within the scope of expansion and notable as a standalone individual article. — Indian:BIO · [ ChitChat ] 03:59, 4 March 2013 (UTC) reply