- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Humans of Hindutva
- Humans of Hindutva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A deleted web page can be described in Freedom of expression in India or any related pages, WP:WITHIN Safe My Edit ( talk) 22:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think Humans of Hindutva is unsuitable to be described in either Freedom of expression in India or any related pages like Internet censorship in India because the article does not fall under any of these. Another important point is that it has multiple reliable sources (like Quartz, The Wire (Indian web publication), ScoopWhoop, Hindustan Times) independent of the subject that provide more than just a mere trivial mention. So it should remain an independent article. Che12Guevara 10:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Che12Guevara ( talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable deleted Facebook page that was covered by other unreliable sources (thewire.in, scoopwhoop}. Raymond3023 ( talk) 10:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why are thewire.in, scoopwhoop non-reliable? Che12Guevara 17:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It should be deleted as per WP:PROMO and sources are not reliable. Anmolbhat ( talk) 03:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why WP:PROMO? Che12Guevara 17:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly does not meet WP:GNG to have a separate article. A passing mention can be made in Freedom of expression in India. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 08:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Yunshui 雲 水 10:44, 9 January 2018 (UTC)
Humans of Hindutva
- Humans of Hindutva ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A deleted web page can be described in Freedom of expression in India or any related pages, WP:WITHIN Safe My Edit ( talk) 22:13, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think Humans of Hindutva is unsuitable to be described in either Freedom of expression in India or any related pages like Internet censorship in India because the article does not fall under any of these. Another important point is that it has multiple reliable sources (like Quartz, The Wire (Indian web publication), ScoopWhoop, Hindustan Times) independent of the subject that provide more than just a mere trivial mention. So it should remain an independent article. Che12Guevara 10:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Che12Guevara ( talk • contribs)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. PriceDL ( talk) 23:30, 2 January 2018 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. North America 1000 23:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable deleted Facebook page that was covered by other unreliable sources (thewire.in, scoopwhoop}. Raymond3023 ( talk) 10:55, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why are thewire.in, scoopwhoop non-reliable? Che12Guevara 17:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It should be deleted as per WP:PROMO and sources are not reliable. Anmolbhat ( talk) 03:39, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why WP:PROMO? Che12Guevara 17:01, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Clearly does not meet WP:GNG to have a separate article. A passing mention can be made in Freedom of expression in India. Adamgerber80 ( talk) 08:17, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.