The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not meet the general notability guideline. Two of the sources are from a licensed TV affiliate, and are not sufficiently independent to verify notability. The other sources merely verify his existence. The general notability guideline calls for significant coverage, where "sources address the subject directly in detail" and they should offer "more than a trivial mention". Shooterwalker ( talk) 22:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply
The result was delete. -- Cirt ( talk) 00:48, 30 May 2011 (UTC) reply
Does not meet the general notability guideline. Two of the sources are from a licensed TV affiliate, and are not sufficiently independent to verify notability. The other sources merely verify his existence. The general notability guideline calls for significant coverage, where "sources address the subject directly in detail" and they should offer "more than a trivial mention". Shooterwalker ( talk) 22:10, 16 May 2011 (UTC) reply