The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Columbus Crew SC#Club culture. There is already some mention of Hudson Street Hooligans at Columbus Crew SC#Club culture, and there is at least some feeling here that a full merge would not be appropriate, so just going with the redirect. If anybody wants to cherry-pick from this article's history to add to Columbus Crew, that's within normal editorial judgement. -- RoySmith (talk) 18:54, 27 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Hudson Street Hooligans

Hudson Street Hooligans (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)

(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: as utterly non-notable (per WP:NORG) SEE BELOW Quis separabit? 13:51, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ohio-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:39, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Redirect to Columbus Crew SC#Club culture. Giant Snowman 08:56, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply
• Merge into Columbus Crew SC. IJA ( talk) 11:37, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

::: Merge: with Columbus Crew SC; amenable to other editors' suggestions. Quis separabit? 13:44, 9 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Either delete or merge with Columbus Crew SC; I am amenable to other editors' suggestions and to decision based upon consensus. Sorry for dithering and being wishy washy. Those aren't usually adjectives ascribed to me. Quis separabit? 20:08, 14 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Redirect - No independant notability, would not want to merge as the content here is a bit crufty and I am not sure that the FC article needs a paragraph on one fan groups trouble with their pub. Fenix down ( talk) 17:19, 10 November 2014 (UTC) reply
• Delete Fails to meet WP:GNG or Wikipedia:Notability (organizations and companies). I do not see a specialized criteria at WP:NSPORT which this passes. Blue Rasberry (talk) 19:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC) reply

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica ¹⁰⁰⁰ 03:16, 16 November 2014 (UTC) reply

• Keep or at least hold on for a bit. A quick search pulls up a few sources. The article is pretty much unsourced but looks easy enough to break down to a sourced stub to start. [1] [2] [3] Cptnono ( talk) 09:56, 24 November 2014 (UTC) reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.