From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker ( talk) 19:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Howden AFC

Howden AFC (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article originally PRODded with the rationale "Very low-level amateur team, never played at a level of football deemed notable by WP:FOOTY.". Disputed with the rationale "Removing PROD. This is not an open or shut case" -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - WP:FOOTYN failure, has not played in a national cup nor at a national level of the pyramid. No indication that the club has garnered significant, reliable, non-routine coverage for any other activities. Fenix down ( talk) 11:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable team. Giant Snowman 11:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. NN. Needs to be a shut case. Szzuk ( talk) 20:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Tawker ( talk) 19:41, 7 April 2014 (UTC) reply

Howden AFC

Howden AFC (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article originally PRODded with the rationale "Very low-level amateur team, never played at a level of football deemed notable by WP:FOOTY.". Disputed with the rationale "Removing PROD. This is not an open or shut case" -- ChrisTheDude ( talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude ( talk) 11:09, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - WP:FOOTYN failure, has not played in a national cup nor at a national level of the pyramid. No indication that the club has garnered significant, reliable, non-routine coverage for any other activities. Fenix down ( talk) 11:43, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete - non-notable team. Giant Snowman 11:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k ( talk) 15:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
  • Delete. NN. Needs to be a shut case. Szzuk ( talk) 20:30, 31 March 2014 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook