The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.Michig (
talk) 08:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Doesn't seem to rise to the level of
WP:NACTOR. Note: article creator has left an argument for keeping on the article's talk page. —
swpbT 19:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as clearly not yet convincing for independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Slapping a delete notice on a page just eleven minutes after it was first created can be either an incentive to give up, or to plug on and enhance the content. The article creator has clearly researched further and found a number of notable productions which Bishop acted in - and not just as a walk-on, walk-off parts. (I skimmed through the video of
You May Not Kiss the Bride and note he was billed just two names beneath
Vinnie Jones on the front credits - clearly not an alphabetical listing.) All-in-all, I think he just falls the right side of the borderline for notability by meeting option 1 of
WP:ENTHas had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. - at least four films with en.wiki pages for a start. As far as I can deduce from that policy's wording, he isn't expected to attain all three, is he?
Parkywiki (
talk) 13:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Bishop clearly passes the multiple significant roles in notable films criteria.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 02:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep agree with previous poster that Bishop passes criteria 1 of
WP:NACTOR of having prominent roles in notable films, notable meaning having wiki articles. Passing WPNACTOR only needs one of the three criteria to be met.
Atlantic306 (
talk) 21:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep.Michig (
talk) 08:13, 15 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Doesn't seem to rise to the level of
WP:NACTOR. Note: article creator has left an argument for keeping on the article's talk page. —
swpbT 19:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete as clearly not yet convincing for independent notability.
SwisterTwistertalk 22:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep. Slapping a delete notice on a page just eleven minutes after it was first created can be either an incentive to give up, or to plug on and enhance the content. The article creator has clearly researched further and found a number of notable productions which Bishop acted in - and not just as a walk-on, walk-off parts. (I skimmed through the video of
You May Not Kiss the Bride and note he was billed just two names beneath
Vinnie Jones on the front credits - clearly not an alphabetical listing.) All-in-all, I think he just falls the right side of the borderline for notability by meeting option 1 of
WP:ENTHas had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. - at least four films with en.wiki pages for a start. As far as I can deduce from that policy's wording, he isn't expected to attain all three, is he?
Parkywiki (
talk) 13:21, 26 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 06:08, 30 April 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep Bishop clearly passes the multiple significant roles in notable films criteria.
John Pack Lambert (
talk) 02:56, 1 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — Music1201talk 02:32, 8 May 2016 (UTC)reply
Keep agree with previous poster that Bishop passes criteria 1 of
WP:NACTOR of having prominent roles in notable films, notable meaning having wiki articles. Passing WPNACTOR only needs one of the three criteria to be met.
Atlantic306 (
talk) 21:58, 10 May 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.