- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
House of Commons Recess Dates
- House of Commons Recess Dates ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear why the recess dates of the British House of Commons would be a notable subject. We have them listed now since 2012, we are only lacking some 700 years or so of these dates... Fram ( talk) 14:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- Wikipedia is not a calendar, nor is it a indiscriminate collection.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 15:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't really seem to have any encyclopedic value and isn't notable in its own right. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Clear WP:INDISCRIMINATE fail. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:03, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As above, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor a calendar. Missing huge amounts of information. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As noted above this fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Dunarc ( talk) 16:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 17:02, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
House of Commons Recess Dates
- House of Commons Recess Dates ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unclear why the recess dates of the British House of Commons would be a notable subject. We have them listed now since 2012, we are only lacking some 700 years or so of these dates... Fram ( talk) 14:25, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Merry Christmas! Baby miss fortune 14:38, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete- Wikipedia is not a calendar, nor is it a indiscriminate collection.-- Rusf10 ( talk) 15:09, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Doesn't really seem to have any encyclopedic value and isn't notable in its own right. Lugnuts Fire Walk with Me 09:13, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Clear WP:INDISCRIMINATE fail. Icewhiz ( talk) 12:03, 17 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As above, Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information nor a calendar. Missing huge amounts of information. AusLondonder ( talk) 12:56, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
- Delete As noted above this fails WP:INDISCRIMINATE. Dunarc ( talk) 16:57, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.