The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - this company did produce a number of notable game titles in the 1983-1993 period. The article lacks significant RS sources, but maybe it could be restructured as a list article instead, something like 'list of hotb games'. Since the company dissolved in the mid-1990s, there is no chance the article is promotional, so this one should be given a bit more consideration than the many spammy stubs for recent/current software developers.
Dialectric (
talk)
15:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Although I believe there is relevancy here, as no reliable sources can be found about, it should be deleted, its a pity though.
Masterofroks (
talk)
21:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment - this company did produce a number of notable game titles in the 1983-1993 period. The article lacks significant RS sources, but maybe it could be restructured as a list article instead, something like 'list of hotb games'. Since the company dissolved in the mid-1990s, there is no chance the article is promotional, so this one should be given a bit more consideration than the many spammy stubs for recent/current software developers.
Dialectric (
talk)
15:49, 29 March 2016 (UTC)reply
Delete Although I believe there is relevancy here, as no reliable sources can be found about, it should be deleted, its a pity though.
Masterofroks (
talk)
21:06, 2 April 2016 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.