From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Atlas Comics (1950s)#Humor and miscellanea. Sourced presented do not appear strong enough to refute the delete argument Spartaz Humbug! 22:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Homer the Happy Ghost (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. Contrary to the deprodder's thoughts, there appears to be nothing substantial about the comic. It appears in a small laundry list of titles associated with Stan Lee and nothing more. If anything substantial exists, you need much more than a cursory search. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • If it is, I assume it'd be in older print media, but there'd have to be at least some proof as to that existing to let this article linger in this state. There are plenty of series out there that just never received proper attention. TTN ( talk) 00:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. ミラ P 07:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • KEEP I did some minor work on the article days ago [1] and found brief mention in the New York Times and elsewhere. Stan Lee is certainly a notable person. Finding any reviews of something from that long before the internet isn't really feasible. I'd say this publication was notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Remember the notability guidelines are just guidelines not absolute law, they all have a disclaimer that ways "This page documents an English Wikipedia notability guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply." Dream Focus 21:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • The lawsuit one is literally nothing beyond the name being mentioned and has no place in this article whatsoever. The Marvel one is primary and adds nothing. So we have a podcast and a blog. I don't know the standards under which a podcast is acceptable, but that blog really doesn't seem like it should count as one. This is hardly an IAR topic. It can be summarized in two sentences pretty much anywhere. TTN ( talk) 21:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • The New York Times article about a lawsuit reads "Casper inspired a number of less successful comic-book clones, including Homer the Happy Ghost, Timmy the Timid Ghost and Spunky the Smiling Spook." So it is a valid reference to backup the claim this comic came about because of Casper. Dream Focus 02:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Atlas Comics (1950s)#Humor and miscellanea. Sourced presented do not appear strong enough to refute the delete argument Spartaz Humbug! 22:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Homer the Happy Ghost (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This fails to establish notability. Contrary to the deprodder's thoughts, there appears to be nothing substantial about the comic. It appears in a small laundry list of titles associated with Stan Lee and nothing more. If anything substantial exists, you need much more than a cursory search. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. TTN ( talk) 00:14, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • If it is, I assume it'd be in older print media, but there'd have to be at least some proof as to that existing to let this article linger in this state. There are plenty of series out there that just never received proper attention. TTN ( talk) 00:43, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
Note: This discussion has been included in the Article Rescue Squadron's list of content for rescue consideration. ミラ P 07:09, 14 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • KEEP I did some minor work on the article days ago [1] and found brief mention in the New York Times and elsewhere. Stan Lee is certainly a notable person. Finding any reviews of something from that long before the internet isn't really feasible. I'd say this publication was notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Remember the notability guidelines are just guidelines not absolute law, they all have a disclaimer that ways "This page documents an English Wikipedia notability guideline. It is a generally accepted standard that editors should attempt to follow, though it is best treated with common sense, and occasional exceptions may apply." Dream Focus 21:47, 17 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • The lawsuit one is literally nothing beyond the name being mentioned and has no place in this article whatsoever. The Marvel one is primary and adds nothing. So we have a podcast and a blog. I don't know the standards under which a podcast is acceptable, but that blog really doesn't seem like it should count as one. This is hardly an IAR topic. It can be summarized in two sentences pretty much anywhere. TTN ( talk) 21:52, 17 December 2019 (UTC) reply
  • The New York Times article about a lawsuit reads "Casper inspired a number of less successful comic-book clones, including Homer the Happy Ghost, Timmy the Timid Ghost and Spunky the Smiling Spook." So it is a valid reference to backup the claim this comic came about because of Casper. Dream Focus 02:22, 18 December 2019 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook