The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Beach hut. No valid arguments for deletion have been presented and there appears to be no agreement on where to send this content if it's merged. That said, the article is almost entirely unsourced OR, so it can't stay as it is. I'll arbitrarily redirect the page for now based on the reasonable suggestion of one participant; if any editor disagrees on the target or method of integration, they can feel free to boldly change it. – Juliancolton |
Talk18:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)reply
You see these results(just look at the first 8 pages) and you really suspect that this is a
WP:HOAX? This is not a hoax. That doesn't make it worthy for inclusion... but even passing mentions in many sources of sufficient reliability establish the existance(but not the notability) of the subject.
Burning Pillar (
talk)
21:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Burning Pillar:Could you please cite some sources here? Maybe I'll withdraw this nomination (and confirm notability could be established) if you're able to give some sources that ensure it is not a hoax.
RoCo(talk)21:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Neutral for the following reasons: firstly, no valid deletion rationale has been provided - see the first entry under
WP:SKCRIT. Secondly however, I do not feel able to evaluate the notability of this subject as I suspect most of the sources that cover this subject in detail will not be in english. Of course, Wikipedia does not exclude sources in other languages, I'm just not able to speak them with any fluency.
Exemplo347 (
talk)
22:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge and Redirect to
Gazebo. Not sufficiently notable as a stand-alone article. Can be mentioned in Gazebo as a local variation in the Maldives.
MB03:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to
Beach hut. No valid arguments for deletion have been presented and there appears to be no agreement on where to send this content if it's merged. That said, the article is almost entirely unsourced OR, so it can't stay as it is. I'll arbitrarily redirect the page for now based on the reasonable suggestion of one participant; if any editor disagrees on the target or method of integration, they can feel free to boldly change it. – Juliancolton |
Talk18:34, 19 April 2017 (UTC)reply
You see these results(just look at the first 8 pages) and you really suspect that this is a
WP:HOAX? This is not a hoax. That doesn't make it worthy for inclusion... but even passing mentions in many sources of sufficient reliability establish the existance(but not the notability) of the subject.
Burning Pillar (
talk)
21:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
@
Burning Pillar:Could you please cite some sources here? Maybe I'll withdraw this nomination (and confirm notability could be established) if you're able to give some sources that ensure it is not a hoax.
RoCo(talk)21:06, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Neutral for the following reasons: firstly, no valid deletion rationale has been provided - see the first entry under
WP:SKCRIT. Secondly however, I do not feel able to evaluate the notability of this subject as I suspect most of the sources that cover this subject in detail will not be in english. Of course, Wikipedia does not exclude sources in other languages, I'm just not able to speak them with any fluency.
Exemplo347 (
talk)
22:55, 24 March 2017 (UTC)reply
Merge and Redirect to
Gazebo. Not sufficiently notable as a stand-alone article. Can be mentioned in Gazebo as a local variation in the Maldives.
MB03:38, 3 April 2017 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.