- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hocoma ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article was WP:PRODded, deleted, went through WP:REFUND where I put it after a new editor asked for it at the Help Desk, and here we are. I must say I agree with the PROD rationale of "fails WP:ORGDEPTH". FWIW I found this mention in the Swiss press (my German is not great, but it looks like a passing mention anyways). Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 18:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References fail criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Reference above from bazonline.ch fails WP:CORPDEPTH as it is a mention-in-passing with no in-depth details provided. -- HighKing ++ 17:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as the original PROD nom and as per nom here. Domdeparis ( talk) 09:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus ( talk, contributions) 19:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
- Hocoma ( | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The article was WP:PRODded, deleted, went through WP:REFUND where I put it after a new editor asked for it at the Help Desk, and here we are. I must say I agree with the PROD rationale of "fails WP:ORGDEPTH". FWIW I found this mention in the Swiss press (my German is not great, but it looks like a passing mention anyways). Tigraan Click here to contact me 17:42, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Mark the train Discuss 18:18, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Switzerland-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal ( talk) 22:39, 23 September 2017 (UTC)
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America 1000 16:25, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete No indications of notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. References fail criteria for establishing notability WP:CORPDEPTH and/or WP:ORGIND. Reference above from bazonline.ch fails WP:CORPDEPTH as it is a mention-in-passing with no in-depth details provided. -- HighKing ++ 17:18, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as the original PROD nom and as per nom here. Domdeparis ( talk) 09:56, 5 October 2017 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.