The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not a notable topic, cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse than any other major city, hence WP:N and WP:UNDUE concerns. Alternate proposal is to merge this article with the "History of sports in Syracuse, New York".
LegalSmeagolian (
talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete History of the cycling industry in Syracuse could perhaps be an article. This is basically a list of companies and bicyclists, given without any sort of context. I don't see anything worth saving.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment -- The number of companies making Bicycles, might suggest that this was a centre from their manufacture (a commercial cluster). If so there may be material to merge to
Syracuse, New York or a wider article on its history.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete this isn't a history of cycling, it's a list of cycling shops, which isn't notable or needed.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 09:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: While I don't think the nom statement that cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse (it seems there were a number of cycling companies based there) is correct, I would agree that the article (especially as written) is not notable
Eddie891TalkWork 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Not a notable topic, cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse than any other major city, hence WP:N and WP:UNDUE concerns. Alternate proposal is to merge this article with the "History of sports in Syracuse, New York".
LegalSmeagolian (
talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete History of the cycling industry in Syracuse could perhaps be an article. This is basically a list of companies and bicyclists, given without any sort of context. I don't see anything worth saving.
Oaktree b (
talk) 17:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Comment -- The number of companies making Bicycles, might suggest that this was a centre from their manufacture (a commercial cluster). If so there may be material to merge to
Syracuse, New York or a wider article on its history.
Peterkingiron (
talk) 15:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete this isn't a history of cycling, it's a list of cycling shops, which isn't notable or needed.
Joseph2302 (
talk) 09:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC)reply
Delete: While I don't think the nom statement that cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse (it seems there were a number of cycling companies based there) is correct, I would agree that the article (especially as written) is not notable
Eddie891TalkWork 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.