From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply

History of cycling in Syracuse, New York

History of cycling in Syracuse, New York (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable topic, cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse than any other major city, hence WP:N and WP:UNDUE concerns. Alternate proposal is to merge this article with the "History of sports in Syracuse, New York". LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete History of the cycling industry in Syracuse could perhaps be an article. This is basically a list of companies and bicyclists, given without any sort of context. I don't see anything worth saving. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Comment -- The number of companies making Bicycles, might suggest that this was a centre from their manufacture (a commercial cluster). If so there may be material to merge to Syracuse, New York or a wider article on its history. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this isn't a history of cycling, it's a list of cycling shops, which isn't notable or needed. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: While I don't think the nom statement that cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse (it seems there were a number of cycling companies based there) is correct, I would agree that the article (especially as written) is not notable Eddie891 Talk Work 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Extraordinary Writ ( talk) 21:09, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply

History of cycling in Syracuse, New York

History of cycling in Syracuse, New York (  | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – ( View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources:  Google ( books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not a notable topic, cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse than any other major city, hence WP:N and WP:UNDUE concerns. Alternate proposal is to merge this article with the "History of sports in Syracuse, New York". LegalSmeagolian ( talk) 15:34, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply

Delete History of the cycling industry in Syracuse could perhaps be an article. This is basically a list of companies and bicyclists, given without any sort of context. I don't see anything worth saving. Oaktree b ( talk) 17:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Comment -- The number of companies making Bicycles, might suggest that this was a centre from their manufacture (a commercial cluster). If so there may be material to merge to Syracuse, New York or a wider article on its history. Peterkingiron ( talk) 15:10, 18 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete this isn't a history of cycling, it's a list of cycling shops, which isn't notable or needed. Joseph 2302 ( talk) 09:03, 20 March 2023 (UTC) reply
  • Delete: While I don't think the nom statement that cycling is no more prevalent in Syracuse (it seems there were a number of cycling companies based there) is correct, I would agree that the article (especially as written) is not notable Eddie891 Talk Work 19:43, 21 March 2023 (UTC) reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Videos

Youtube | Vimeo | Bing

Websites

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Encyclopedia

Google | Yahoo | Bing

Facebook