The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn.
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 01:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Despite it's "official" name and a sign stuck out front, it isn't particularly noteworthy. It is an ordinary tiny church. It is not on any official list of historical places. The article does not claim the members have ever done anything notable. The church isn't, except for the marker. Nothing in reliable sources.
Student7 (
talk) 14:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Student7 (
talk) 14:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. It's on the Florida Division of Historical Resources list
[1] and it was important enough to the town to fix it up and badge it as historic
[2].--
Arxiloxos (
talk) 15:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment. Changed my mind above to "Keep."
Student7 (
talk) 20:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was nomination withdrawn.
Ron Ritzman (
talk) 01:05, 12 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Delete. Despite it's "official" name and a sign stuck out front, it isn't particularly noteworthy. It is an ordinary tiny church. It is not on any official list of historical places. The article does not claim the members have ever done anything notable. The church isn't, except for the marker. Nothing in reliable sources.
Student7 (
talk) 14:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)
Student7 (
talk) 14:19, 5 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Weak keep. It's on the Florida Division of Historical Resources list
[1] and it was important enough to the town to fix it up and badge it as historic
[2].--
Arxiloxos (
talk) 15:17, 5 April 2011 (UTC)reply
Comment. Changed my mind above to "Keep."
Student7 (
talk) 20:45, 7 April 2011 (UTC)reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.